logo-ahplogo-ahplogo-ahplogo-ahp
  • Home
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Linked Stream
  • Solutions
      • Anticorruption & Good Corporate Governance
      • Banking & Finance
      • Capital Markets
      • Competition Law
      • Debt & Corporate Restructuring
      • Dispute Resolution
      • Energy, Oil & Gas
      • Foreign Direct Investment
      • Fraud & Forensics Investigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Islamic Finance
      • Labor Law
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Projects & Natural Resources
      • Real Property
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Tax & Customs Services
      • Telecommunications & Media
  • Members
  • Events
    • News & Insights
  • Rajah Tann Asia
✕
            No results See all results

            KPPU Introduces New Guideline on Simplified Assessment

            In response to the multiple interpretation of the latest Merger Regulation (“2019 Merger Regulation“), the KPPU finally issued implementing guidelines on merger, consolidation, or acquisition, which came into force in 6 October 2020.

            Assessment

            First introduced in July 2020 (despite already being a common practice of the KPPU from an earlier period), (click here to read our client update on this topic), the KPPU has now formally acknowledges the simplified merger1 notification procedure under the new guideline. Now, the simplified procedure is referred to as an “simplified assessment.”.

            Once KPPU approves or decides to implement an assessment, eligible businesses will essentially be on the “fast track” for receiving their merger review. The guideline regulates that the KPPU must complete this simplified assessment within 14 business days, which is expected to occur and be completed within the 60 business days clarification and research phase. This is a significantly shorter timeframe compared to the maximum 150 business days of the traditional merger notification process.

            Either the KPPU or the notifying party can request for a simplified assessment if, among others:

            1. the parties are not engaged in overlapping or vertically related markets, or if they are, the HHI2 value after the transaction falls within a certain range;
            2. the relevant parties to the transaction are engaged in overlapping markets and the HHI value after the transaction is:
              1. less than 1,500 (“Spectrum I“);
              2. between 1,500 and 2,500 with the increased HHI, or also known as delta HHI, of less than or equal to 250; or
              3. over 2,500 with the increased HHI of less than or equal to 150.
            3. the relevant parties to the transaction are engaged in vertically related markets in which the HHI value of each market is within the Spectrum I;
            4. the parties do not engage in tying, bundling, or other practices that may result in a network effect;
            5. the merger notification is submitted within 30 business days from the date when the transaction becomes effective; and/or
            6. the merger results in a change of control in the target from being jointly controlled by the acquirer and the previous shareholders, to being solely controlled by the acquirer.

            Exempted Asset Acquisition

            The guideline also affirms that an asset acquisition that satisfies one of the criteria below would not trigger the mandatory notification post-acquisition to the KPPU:

            1. the value of the asset acquisition is below IDR 250 billion (for non-banking industries) or IDR 2.5 trillion (for banking industry);
            2. the asset acquisition is part of the purchaser’s ordinary course of business;
            3. for businesses in the real property industry, the asset acquired is intended to be used as an office by the purchaser or as a social/public facility; or
            4. the asset acquired is not related to the purchaser’s business activity, e.g. asset is acquired as part of the purchaser’s corporate social responsibility or non-profit activities.

            Other Notable Items

            Lastly, the new guideline also asserts or clarifies notable topics within the competition law framework in Indonesia. First, the KPPU confirms that it will assess any acquisition that is equivalent to a shares acquisition. This means that transactions such as a transfer of asset or an acquisition of participating interest are now subject to the KPPU’s scrutiny.

            Second, the KPPU clarifies that the value of the acquired assets as part of the threshold calculation is calculated based on either the value of the target asset as stated in the latest financial statements of the seller or the transaction value, whichever is higher.

            Third, in a merger involving a joint venture entity, the KPPU will consider the joint venture entity as the ultimate parent entity of the group. Consequently, the calculation of thresholds and local nexus test will only take into account the Indonesian sales value, the worldwide assets value, and the local presence of the joint venture and its subsidiaries. This will also be the case where the purchaser is a subsidiary of a joint venture. As a result, the list of relevant parties in a merger involving a joint venture will significantly change.

            Here, it is worth noting that a greenfield joint venture is exempted from the notification obligation. But a joint venture created as a result of a shares or asset acquisition will still trigger the notification obligation if it meets the necessary criteria.

            Fourth, a foreign merger that has an impact to the Indonesian market will be notifiable. The impact criterion will be satisfied if, among others, a party to the transaction has business activities in Indonesia and the other party has a sister company that conducts business activities in and/or sales into Indonesia.

            Lastly, the KPPU confirms that financial statements and articles of association that will be submitted to the KPPU must either be summarised or translated into Indonesian. This has always been the approach of the KPPU and in the past, KPPU could refuse to register a notification for failure to provide the Indonesian summary or translation.

            Conclusion

            The introduction of the simplified assessment is one of the major breakthroughs from the KPPU. But in order to be able to enforce it, the KPPU is likely to request for more comprehensive information and documents in complex transactions compared to the traditional merger notification process. Thus, it is crucial that transacting parties ensure the availability of documents (such as market data) before applying for an assessment.

            The other clarifications are certainly welcomed, and we expect that transacting parties will benefit greatly from this guideline.

             


             

            1. For easy reference, merger under the 2019 Merger Regulation and the new guideline means a merger, consolidation, and a shares/asset-based transaction.
            2. Herfindahl-Hirschman Index.

             

            Contacts

             

            HMBC Rikrik Rizkiyana
            Partner

            D (62) 21 2555 7855
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            rikrik.rizkiyana@ahp.id

            Farid Fauzi Nasution
            Partner

            D (62) 21 2555 9998
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            farid.nasution@ahp.id

            Vovo Iswanto
            Of Counsel

            D (62) 21 2555 9938
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            vovo.iswanto@ahp.id

            Anastasia Pritahayu R. D., Albert Boy Situmorang, Aulia Alkausar, Ingrid Gratsya Zega, M. Ridha Thanthawi and Umery Lathifa also contributed to this alert.

             

            More Articles

            • OJK Announced Guidelines to Implement Offerings Classified as Non-Public Offerings
              February 7, 2023
            • Regional Trade Highlights 2022
              January 30, 2023
            • Indonesia Expands Its Anti-Tax-Avoidance Measures: A Development to be Aware of in Tax Planning and Compliance
              January 27, 2023
            • Dissecting the Amendment to the Omnibus Law: Which Sectors are Affected and How?
              January 20, 2023
            • A New Rule Requires Importers of Software or Other Digital Products via Electronic Transmission to Fulfil Customs Obligations
              January 16, 2023
            • Rajah & Tann Asia Member Firms, Members of Lifesciences Asia-Pacific Network (LAN), Contribute to the Singapore and Indonesia Chapters of Comparative Study: Patent Linkage Systems in APAC
              January 13, 2023
            • Indonesia’s New Criminal Code Introduces Corporate Crime
              January 4, 2023
            • A Practical Guide to Getting Your Organisation PDP Law-Ready
              December 1, 2022
            • Shipping Law Updates
              November 16, 2022
            • Arb-Med-Arb: An Effort to Enhance Amicable Dispute Resolution
              September 30, 2022
            By Practice Area
            • Projects & Energy
            • Technology Media & Telecommunications
            • Intellectual Property
            • Real Property
            • Banking & Finance
            • Capital Markets
            • Competition
            • Mergers & Acquisitions
            • Dispute Resolution
            • Tax and Customs

            Jakarta Office

            Capital Place, Level 36 & 37
            Jalan Jenderal Gatot Subroto Kav. 18
            Jakarta 12710,
            Indonesia

            Phone: +62 21 2555 7800
            Fax: +62 21 2555 7899
            Email: info@ahp.id


            Subcribe

            Surabaya Office

            Pakuwon Center, Superblok Tunjungan City
            Lantai 11, Unit 08
            Jalan Embong Malang No. 1, 3, 5,
            Surabaya 60261
            Indonesia

            Phone: +62 31 5116 4550
            Fax: +62 31 5116 4560

            Assegaf Hamzah & Partners


            © 2001 - 2022 Assegaf Hamzah & Partners. All rights reserved.

            Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.

            Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.

            This website is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this website.