logo-ahplogo-ahplogo-ahplogo-ahp
  • Home
  • Firm
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Linked Stream
  • Solutions
      • Anticorruption & Good Corporate Governance
      • Banking & Finance
      • Capital Markets
      • Competition Law
      • Debt & Corporate Restructuring
      • Dispute Resolution
      • Energy, Oil & Gas
      • Foreign Direct Investment
      • Fraud & Forensics Investigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Islamic Finance
      • Labor Law
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Projects & Natural Resources
      • Real Property
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Tax & Customs Services
      • Telecommunications & Media
  • Members
  • Events
    • News & Insights
  • Rajah Tann Asia
✕
            No results See all results

            The Omnibus Law Removes Cap on Fines for Competition Law Violations

            The third edition of “Omnibus Law 2020: Overview Series” will highlight changes in the competition sector.


             

            With the spotlight on weighty items such as employment, the government, through the Omnibus Law, has also revised several provisions of the Competition Law (Law No. 5 of 1999). As we will discuss below, while these revisions appeared to be minor, they may have severe consequences.

            Changes for the Better?

            The most notable revision in the Omnibus Law is the removal of the cap on administrative fine and criminal sanctions.

            Initially, the Indonesia Competition Commission or KPPU can impose an administrative fine between IDR 1 billion to IDR 25 billion. Now, although the minimum of IDR 1 billion still applies, the IDR 25 billion cap has been taken out.

            In addition, it used to be the case that violation of substantive laws and/or obstruction of a KPPU examination or investigation are subject to criminal sanctions. Under the Omnibus Law, criminal sanctions only apply for obstruction of KPPU examination or investigation. The sanctions are now more severe with imprisonment of up to one year (from previously imprisonment of up to three months) for substituting criminal fines of up to IDR 5 billion. On the other hand, additional criminal sanctions such as revocation of license and prohibition to act as a director or commissioner have been taken out.

            Lastly, the Omnibus Law also changes the appeal procedure against a KPPU decision from the district court to the commercial court.

            Consequences

            Removal of cap and criminal sanctions

            The removal of the IDR 25 billion cap means that potentially, the sky is the limit for KPPU in imposing fines against violating parties. However, the Omnibus Law made it imperative that the implementation of the administrative fine will be further regulated in the implementing regulations, thus it is likely that the right balance is struck. The implementing regulations should also stipulate the criteria, types, amount, and procedures for the administrative fines. This will be crucial in the government’s overall goal for enacting the Omnibus Law in the first place, which is to improve the ease of doing business in Indonesia.

            Meanwhile, although the removal of the criminal sanctions may seem drastic, it is essential to note that the criminal aspect of the Competition Law has never been exercised before. Moreover, under the Competition Law, KPPU only has administrative authority. The authority to enforce criminal sanctions lies with the district courts. However, this authority has never been exercised before because the procedure itself is unclear.

            New appeal procedure

            The current law’s ecosystem only allows an appeal in a competition case to be lodged to the district courts. Despite moving the appeal process to the commercial court, the Omnibus Law and other prevailing regulations do not provide any further details. The current procedural laws and regulations applicable in the commercial court only apply to cases on intellectual property, bankruptcy, or liquidation, each of which is subject to different procedures and is regulated in different laws.

            Consequently, this new appeal procedure for competition cases will most likely trigger other potential concerns in practice. It remains unclear whether the civil procedural law will apply or whether the Supreme Court will temporarily fill the gap by issuing a circular letter to allow the appeal of a competition case to be heard in the commercial court.

            Key takeaways

            Like other sectors that have experienced significant revamping under the Omnibus Law, this will be a period of “wait and see”. Although far from ideal, businesses should use this time to revisit and ensure that their business arrangements fully comply with the Competition Law.

             


             

            The third edition of “Omnibus Law 2020: Overview Series” will highlight changes in the competition sector.

            It has come to our attention that there are multiple drafts of the bill in public circulation. Analysis may differ depending on which version of the draft is used as the basis. We continue to monitor this evolving situation, with various teams currently examining the bill to produce updates that are relevant to you. As always, we are committed to supporting you with advice and guidance. You can find our alerts on the Omnibus Law here.

            If you have any questions or concerns, please contact our attorneys or the BD team at BD@ahp.id.

             

            Contacts

             

            HMBC Rikrik Rizkiyana
            Partner

            D (62) 21 2555 7855
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            rikrik.rizkiyana@ahp.id

            Farid Fauzi Nasution
            Partner

            D (62) 21 2555 9998
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            farid.nasution@ahp.id

            Vovo Iswanto
            Of Counsel

            D (62) 21 2555 9938
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            vovo.iswanto@ahp.id

            Asep Ridwan
            Partner

            D (62) 21 2555 7819
            F (62) 21 2555 7899
            asep.ridwan@ahp.id

            Anastasia Pritahayu R. D., Wisnu Wardhana, Albert Boy Situmorang, Berla Wahyu Pratama and M. Ridha Thanthawi also contributed to this alert.

             

            More Articles

            • OJK Announced Guidelines to Implement Offerings Classified as Non-Public Offerings
              February 7, 2023
            • Regional Trade Highlights 2022
              January 30, 2023
            • Indonesia Expands Its Anti-Tax-Avoidance Measures: A Development to be Aware of in Tax Planning and Compliance
              January 27, 2023
            • Dissecting the Amendment to the Omnibus Law: Which Sectors are Affected and How?
              January 20, 2023
            • A New Rule Requires Importers of Software or Other Digital Products via Electronic Transmission to Fulfil Customs Obligations
              January 16, 2023
            • Rajah & Tann Asia Member Firms, Members of Lifesciences Asia-Pacific Network (LAN), Contribute to the Singapore and Indonesia Chapters of Comparative Study: Patent Linkage Systems in APAC
              January 13, 2023
            • Indonesia’s New Criminal Code Introduces Corporate Crime
              January 4, 2023
            • A Practical Guide to Getting Your Organisation PDP Law-Ready
              December 1, 2022
            • Shipping Law Updates
              November 16, 2022
            • Arb-Med-Arb: An Effort to Enhance Amicable Dispute Resolution
              September 30, 2022
            By Practice Area
            • Projects & Energy
            • Technology Media & Telecommunications
            • Intellectual Property
            • Real Property
            • Banking & Finance
            • Capital Markets
            • Competition
            • Mergers & Acquisitions
            • Dispute Resolution
            • Tax and Customs

            Jakarta Office

            Capital Place, Level 36 & 37
            Jalan Jenderal Gatot Subroto Kav. 18
            Jakarta 12710,
            Indonesia

            Phone: +62 21 2555 7800
            Fax: +62 21 2555 7899
            Email: info@ahp.id


            Subcribe

            Surabaya Office

            Pakuwon Center, Superblok Tunjungan City
            Lantai 11, Unit 08
            Jalan Embong Malang No. 1, 3, 5,
            Surabaya 60261
            Indonesia

            Phone: +62 31 5116 4550
            Fax: +62 31 5116 4560

            Assegaf Hamzah & Partners


            © 2001 - 2022 Assegaf Hamzah & Partners. All rights reserved.

            Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.

            Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.

            This website is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this website.